<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Catavino - Latest Comments in Iberian News from Around the Web</title><link>http://catavino.disqus.com/</link><description>Spanish Wine, Portuguese Wine, their foods, and cultures</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 08:24:41 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Iberian News from Around the Web</title><link>http://www.catavino.net/blog/iberian-news-from-around-the-web/#comment-2418095</link><description>Better yet, how effective would the Internet be without another person, expert or otherwise, to share information with? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree with you Philip, and I believe we all fall victim to Gregory's mindset. For years, our education has been linear, one-sided, coming directly from the "expert". Consequently, we have tended to believe that our opinions are worthless if not validated by a professional. Personal experience meant nothing as compared to a "scholarly" opinion. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; I still remember the door to door salesman who sold the "official" Encyclopedia Britannica series seducing my parents with terms like "facts", "experts", "statistics", "official". &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Times have changed, however, as a result of the Internet, forcing us to look to our peers for knowledge, truth, motivation, encouragement, etc, rather than our "certified" experts.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Therefore a wine is only as valuable as consumer who buys it. Few of us read Decanter or know who Robert Parker is; yet all of us will trust the opinion of some good friends. If our friends share their passion of a wine, we buy it and share our opinions with our circle of friends, so on and so forth.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gabriella</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 08:24:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Iberian News from Around the Web</title><link>http://www.catavino.net/blog/iberian-news-from-around-the-web/#comment-2418098</link><description>Better yet, how effective would the Internet be without another person, expert or otherwise, to share information with?  &lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree with you Philip, and I believe we all fall victim to Gregory&amp;#039;s mindset. For years, our education has been linear, one-sided, coming directly from the &amp;quot;expert&amp;quot;. Consequently, we have tended to believe that our opinions are worthless if not validated by a professional. Personal experience meant nothing as compared to a &amp;quot;scholarly&amp;quot; opinion.  &lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I still remember the door to door salesman who sold the &amp;quot;official&amp;quot; Encyclopedia Britannica series seducing my parents with terms like &amp;quot;facts&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;statistics&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;official&amp;quot;.  &lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Times have changed, however, as a result of the Internet, forcing us to look to our peers for knowledge, truth, motivation, encouragement, etc, rather than our &amp;quot;certified&amp;quot; experts. &lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Therefore a wine is only as valuable as consumer who buys it. Few of us read Decanter or know who Robert Parker is; yet all of us will trust the opinion of some good friends. If our friends share their passion of a wine, we buy it and share our opinions with our circle of friends, so on and so forth.  &lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gabriella</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 06:24:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Iberian News from Around the Web</title><link>http://www.catavino.net/blog/iberian-news-from-around-the-web/#comment-2418096</link><description>I didn't even know Decanter allowed comments. But once I did, I was glad to stumble across this article. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We may not all have English Language doctorates from Oxford, but there's an incredible value to single reviews in many cases, and to the aggregation of such data in all cases.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here's a great review that was left by one of our 'common users' yesterday:&lt;br&gt;"Great color. Crushed red fruit, cassis, violet and anise nose. Big palate with layered smooth fruit. Complex. Great fruit character on finish. Still tight, but great potential here."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;and here's another, much simpler, one:&lt;br&gt;'Delicious.'&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Do I care that some random person found this wine delicious? What about if 14 out of 16 did? Or, how about 1 out of 5? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At some point, even the merest snippets of data become valuable when combined with others. How useful would a football chant be with just one participant?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PhilipJames</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:31:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Iberian News from Around the Web</title><link>http://www.catavino.net/blog/iberian-news-from-around-the-web/#comment-2418097</link><description>I didn&amp;#039;t even know Decanter allowed comments. But once I did, I was glad to stumble across this article.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We may not all have English Language doctorates from Oxford, but there&amp;#039;s an incredible value to single reviews in many cases, and to the aggregation of such data in all cases. &lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here&amp;#039;s a great review that was left by one of our &amp;#039;common users&amp;#039; yesterday:&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Great color. Crushed red fruit, cassis, violet and anise nose. Big palate with layered smooth fruit. Complex. Great fruit character on finish. Still tight, but great potential here.&amp;quot; &lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;and here&amp;#039;s another, much simpler, one:&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;#039;Delicious.&amp;#039; &lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Do I care that some random person found this wine delicious? What about if 14 out of 16 did? Or, how about 1 out of 5?  &lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At some point, even the merest snippets of data become valuable when combined with others. How useful would a football chant be with just one participant?  &lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Philip James</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 13:31:48 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>