Community Page
- catavino.net Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- Spanish fruit in a good year holds enough character to be worth preserving without "oak". An old neutral barrel for storage is a different and practical matter, but "oak" is too...
- Great read Gabriella. Was hoping to go to the bloggers conference, but clashes with another trip. Regards, Lindsay
- Nice post. Very evocative imagery. Cheers!
- Hey Bill, happy belated birthday from both of us! We're so sorry we couldn't have celebrated with you, but we'll make us for lost time at Christmas ;-)
- Agree with your thoughts on bottle aged wine. Just finished up my birthday dinner. One of the bottles was a '95 Ch. Lascombes. It's been in my cellar (wine closet) for 10 years or so. Funny...
Catavino
Spanish Wine, Portuguese Wine, their foods, and cultures
Here’s a quickie of what being talked about around the web on Spanish and Portuguese wine:
Edward Deitch at MSNBC has jumped ship, conceding that even the cheapy’s from big wineries such as Marqués de Riscal can be both unique and tasty. I admit that I’ ... Continue reading »
Edward Deitch at MSNBC has jumped ship, conceding that even the cheapy’s from big wineries such as Marqués de Riscal can be both unique and tasty. I admit that I’ ... Continue reading »
1 year ago
We may not all have English Language doctorates from Oxford, but there's an incredible value to single reviews in many cases, and to the aggregation of such data in all cases.
Here's a great review that was left by one of our 'common users' yesterday:
"Great color. Crushed red fruit, cassis, violet and anise nose. Big palate with layered smooth fruit. Complex. Great fruit character on finish. Still tight, but great potential here."
and here's another, much simpler, one:
'Delicious.'
Do I care that some random person found this wine delicious? What about if 14 out of 16 did? Or, how about 1 out of 5?
At some point, even the merest snippets of data become valuable when combined with others. How useful would a football chant be with just one participant?
1 year ago
We may not all have English Language doctorates from Oxford, but there's an incredible value to single reviews in many cases, and to the aggregation of such data in all cases.
Here's a great review that was left by one of our 'common users' yesterday:
"Great color. Crushed red fruit, cassis, violet and anise nose. Big palate with layered smooth fruit. Complex. Great fruit character on finish. Still tight, but great potential here."
and here's another, much simpler, one:
'Delicious.'
Do I care that some random person found this wine delicious? What about if 14 out of 16 did? Or, how about 1 out of 5?
At some point, even the merest snippets of data become valuable when combined with others. How useful would a football chant be with just one participant?
1 year ago
I agree with you Philip, and I believe we all fall victim to Gregory's mindset. For years, our education has been linear, one-sided, coming directly from the "expert". Consequently, we have tended to believe that our opinions are worthless if not validated by a professional. Personal experience meant nothing as compared to a "scholarly" opinion.
I still remember the door to door salesman who sold the "official" Encyclopedia Britannica series seducing my parents with terms like "facts", "experts", "statistics", "official".
Times have changed, however, as a result of the Internet, forcing us to look to our peers for knowledge, truth, motivation, encouragement, etc, rather than our "certified" experts.
Therefore a wine is only as valuable as consumer who buys it. Few of us read Decanter or know who Robert Parker is; yet all of us will trust the opinion of some good friends. If our friends share their passion of a wine, we buy it and share our opinions with our circle of friends, so on and so forth.
1 year ago
I agree with you Philip, and I believe we all fall victim to Gregory's mindset. For years, our education has been linear, one-sided, coming directly from the "expert". Consequently, we have tended to believe that our opinions are worthless if not validated by a professional. Personal experience meant nothing as compared to a "scholarly" opinion.
I still remember the door to door salesman who sold the "official" Encyclopedia Britannica series seducing my parents with terms like "facts", "experts", "statistics", "official".
Times have changed, however, as a result of the Internet, forcing us to look to our peers for knowledge, truth, motivation, encouragement, etc, rather than our "certified" experts.
Therefore a wine is only as valuable as consumer who buys it. Few of us read Decanter or know who Robert Parker is; yet all of us will trust the opinion of some good friends. If our friends share their passion of a wine, we buy it and share our opinions with our circle of friends, so on and so forth.