-
Website
http://catavino.net -
Original page
http://www.catavino.net/blog/catavino-gets-60000-unique-visitors-a-month-oh-and-we-have-a-bridge-for-sale/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
gabriellaopaz
47 comments · 1 points
-
Joel V
7 comments · 1 points
-
emilio
4 comments · 1 points
-
PhilipJames
12 comments · 1 points
-
Dale Cruse
6 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
Since July 2 (about 2 months), I have had 10880 total hits, and 7761 Unique Visitors. So, an average monthly figure is 5440 total hits and 3880 unique visitors. My new blog has only been operational for 4 months now, though I know the numbers are definitely better than my previous one. But they certainly could be better too.
I know from my Referrer stats that I get most of my visitors from Google Searches and Foodie Blogroller referrals.
Please, please, please - do not mention Webalizer numbers. They're meaningless as they count every spider's visit in detail and every spider skews/counts differently.
I see no mention of Statcounter numbers - a damn lot of people (incl. me) pay/use them. Or what about Bloglines subscribers (which was pretty meaningful until recently when Google Reader numbers would became much more telling - but those, I believe, remain unknown to everyone outside of Google).
Since July 2 (about 2 months), I have had 10880 total hits, and 7761 Unique Visitors. So, an average monthly figure is 5440 total hits and 3880 unique visitors. My new blog has only been operational for 4 months now, though I know the numbers are definitely better than my previous one. But they certainly could be better too.
I know from my Referrer stats that I get most of my visitors from Google Searches and Foodie Blogroller referrals.
Please, please, please - do not mention Webalizer numbers. They're meaningless as they count every spider's visit in detail and every spider skews/counts differently.
I see no mention of Statcounter numbers - a damn lot of people (incl. me) pay/use them. Or what about Bloglines subscribers (which was pretty meaningful until recently when Google Reader numbers would became much more telling - but those, I believe, remain unknown to everyone outside of Google).
Oh and obviously forget Webalizer...it's a joke! But I know people who are still looking at them like they are gold! UGH!
Oh and obviously forget Webalizer...it's a joke! But I know people who are still looking at them like they are gold! UGH!
Each has its drawbacks and pluses. This is a long debate but I think that it boils down to what your peer group is using, their ad rates, and your site relative to theirs.
BTW: Good Google page rank could tell you which way the wind is blowing as well...
<a href="http://www.webmasterworld.com/analytics/3227679.h..."><a href="http://www.webmasterworld.com/analytics/..." target="_blank">http://www.webmasterworld.com/analytics/3227679.h...
Each has its drawbacks and pluses. This is a long debate but I think that it boils down to what your peer group is using, their ad rates, and your site relative to theirs.
BTW: Good Google page rank could tell you which way the wind is blowing as well...
<a href="http://www.webmasterworld.com/analytics/3227679.h..."><a href="http://www.webmasterworld.com/analytics/..." target="_blank">http://www.webmasterworld.com/analytics/3227679.h...
Each has its drawbacks and pluses. This is a long debate but I think that it boils down to what your peer group is using, their ad rates, and your site relative to theirs.
BTW: Good Google page rank could tell you which way the wind is blowing as well...
<a href="http://www.webmasterworld.com/analytics/3227679.h..."><a href="http://www.webmasterworld.com/analytics/..." target="_blank">http://www.webmasterworld.com/analytics/3227679.h...
Each has its drawbacks and pluses. This is a long debate but I think that it boils down to what your peer group is using, their ad rates, and your site relative to theirs.
BTW: Good Google page rank could tell you which way the wind is blowing as well...
http://www.webmasterworld.com/analytics/3227679...
I didn't keep track of that or care too much because I never meant to monetize the blog. I like putting my opinions out there, chatting with others, and making new wine contacts. And I've made many. Its a resource for some people and has made it into the Wine Blog Awards and even made it on Engadget one day (when I scooped a story on the Enomatic wine machine). You want to see a bump in traffic try making Engadget one day. that week I went up from about 200 visits a day to 2000 a day. It was NUTS.
Anyway, I use my blog just to write my thoughts and interact whenever possible. Over the 3 years its been up its served its purpose well - meeting wine people and informing its small following with good tips and insights.
Some time ago I think I put Google Analytics up there but I honestly haven't logged in to that in a long long time.
BTW - I don't think Tom's stats (20,000 eyeballs...is that 10K people? good marketing) are unique visits. I think they're Typepad stats as well. but don't quote me on that...
I didn't keep track of that or care too much because I never meant to monetize the blog. I like putting my opinions out there, chatting with others, and making new wine contacts. And I've made many. Its a resource for some people and has made it into the Wine Blog Awards and even made it on Engadget one day (when I scooped a story on the Enomatic wine machine). You want to see a bump in traffic try making Engadget one day. that week I went up from about 200 visits a day to 2000 a day. It was NUTS.
Anyway, I use my blog just to write my thoughts and interact whenever possible. Over the 3 years its been up its served its purpose well - meeting wine people and informing its small following with good tips and insights.
Some time ago I think I put Google Analytics up there but I honestly haven't logged in to that in a long long time.
BTW - I don't think Tom's stats (20,000 eyeballs...is that 10K people? good marketing) are unique visits. I think they're Typepad stats as well. but don't quote me on that...
I didn't keep track of that or care too much because I never meant to monetize the blog. I like putting my opinions out there, chatting with others, and making new wine contacts. And I've made many. Its a resource for some people and has made it into the Wine Blog Awards and even made it on Engadget one day (when I scooped a story on the Enomatic wine machine). You want to see a bump in traffic try making Engadget one day. that week I went up from about 200 visits a day to 2000 a day. It was NUTS.
Anyway, I use my blog just to write my thoughts and interact whenever possible. Over the 3 years its been up its served its purpose well - meeting wine people and informing its small following with good tips and insights.
Some time ago I think I put Google Analytics up there but I honestly haven't logged in to that in a long long time.
BTW - I don't think Tom's stats (20,000 eyeballs...is that 10K people? good marketing) are unique visits. I think they're Typepad stats as well. but don't quote me on that...
I didn't keep track of that or care too much because I never meant to monetize the blog. I like putting my opinions out there, chatting with others, and making new wine contacts. And I've made many. Its a resource for some people and has made it into the Wine Blog Awards and even made it on Engadget one day (when I scooped a story on the Enomatic wine machine). You want to see a bump in traffic try making Engadget one day. that week I went up from about 200 visits a day to 2000 a day. It was NUTS.
Anyway, I use my blog just to write my thoughts and interact whenever possible. Over the 3 years its been up its served its purpose well - meeting wine people and informing its small following with good tips and insights.
Some time ago I think I put Google Analytics up there but I honestly haven't logged in to that in a long long time.
BTW - I don't think Tom's stats (20,000 eyeballs...is that 10K people? good marketing) are unique visits. I think they're Typepad stats as well. but don't quote me on that...
By the way, does anyone know if statcounter takes account of readers who are getting my content via RSS readers? I've never thought about that and base the number of those reading my posts only on statcounter numbers. I don't look at typepad generate stats. Not that they are wrong. I just stick with statcounter.
I've always used my stats as an indication of the attractiveness of my blogging and the interest my comments have. I do the same when evaluating a magazine. The circulation numbers are a very good gauge of the success of the publication.
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/583940/2016293.../>
"><a href="http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/58394..." target="_blank">http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/583940/2016293...
for those wine bloggers interested in putting a prominent link on their site to a new survey in order to obtain more data on a broader range of wine blog readers to contact you. This idea may be worth a greater discussion.
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/583940/2016293.../>
"><a href="http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/58394..." target="_blank">http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/583940/2016293...
for those wine bloggers interested in putting a prominent link on their site to a new survey in order to obtain more data on a broader range of wine blog readers to contact you. This idea may be worth a greater discussion.
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/583940/2016293.../>
"><a href="http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/58394..." target="_blank">http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/583940/2016293...
for those wine bloggers interested in putting a prominent link on their site to a new survey in order to obtain more data on a broader range of wine blog readers to contact you. This idea may be worth a greater discussion.
By the way, does anyone know if statcounter takes account of readers who are getting my content via RSS readers? I've never thought about that and base the number of those reading my posts only on statcounter numbers. I don't look at typepad generate stats. Not that they are wrong. I just stick with statcounter.
I've always used my stats as an indication of the attractiveness of my blogging and the interest my comments have. I do the same when evaluating a magazine. The circulation numbers are a very good gauge of the success of the publication.
for those wine bloggers interested in putting a prominent link on their site to a new survey in order to obtain more data on a broader range of wine blog readers to contact you. This idea may be worth a greater discussion.
August Stats:
Mint: 2500 uniques per month, 10K pageviews
Google: 2400 absolute uniques per month, 9500 pageviews
Don't know where the discrepancy comes from. This was a big dip in traffic from June and July, and traffic is going up again. Also, we have had trouble integrating the analytics tools to track both our blog and the store, and we're still trying to work out the kinks.
We had an enormous spike when we were in Daily Candy...got about a month's worth of traffic in a day. Our goal? Who knows. We'd love to have 500 uniques per day and we'd be pretty happy.
August Stats:
Mint: 2500 uniques per month, 10K pageviews
Google: 2400+ absolute uniques per month, 9500+ pageviews
Don't know where the discrepancy comes from. This was a big dip in traffic from June and July, and traffic is going up again. Also, we have had trouble integrating the analytics tools to track both our blog and the store, and we're still trying to work out the kinks.
We had an enormous spike when we were in Daily Candy...got about a month's worth of traffic in a day. Our goal? Who knows. We'd love to have 500 uniques per day and we'd be pretty happy.